SciCombinator

Discover the most talked about and latest scientific content & concepts.

Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

Science (New York, N.Y.) | 1 Sep 2015

Abstract
Reproducibility is a defining feature of science, but the extent to which it characterizes current research is unknown. We conducted replications of 100 experimental and correlational studies published in three psychology journals using high-powered designs and original materials when available. Replication effects were half the magnitude of original effects, representing a substantial decline. Ninety-seven percent of original studies had statistically significant results. Thirty-six percent of replications had statistically significant results; 47% of original effect sizes were in the 95% confidence interval of the replication effect size; 39% of effects were subjectively rated to have replicated the original result; and if no bias in original results is assumed, combining original and replication results left 68% with statistically significant effects. Correlational tests suggest that replication success was better predicted by the strength of original evidence than by characteristics of the original and replication teams.
Tweets*
1988
Facebook likes*
57
Reddit*
9
News coverage*
153
Blogs*
117
SC clicks
1
Concepts
Psychology, Meta-analysis, Statistical hypothesis testing, Statistical power, Effect size, Statistics, Statistical significance, Scientific method
MeSH headings
-
comments powered by Disqus

* Data courtesy of Altmetric.com