SciCombinator

Discover the most talked about and latest scientific content & concepts.

Abstract
Every day, thousands of polls, surveys, and rating scales are employed to elicit the attitudes of humankind. Given the ubiquitous use of these instruments, it seems we ought to have firm answers to what is measured by them, but unfortunately we do not. To help remedy this situation, we present a novel approach to investigate the nature of attitudes. We created a self-transforming paper survey of moral opinions, covering both foundational principles, and current dilemmas hotly debated in the media. This survey used a magic trick to expose participants to a reversal of their previously stated attitudes, allowing us to record whether they were prepared to endorse and argue for the opposite view of what they had stated only moments ago. The result showed that the majority of the reversals remained undetected, and a full 69% of the participants failed to detect at least one of two changes. In addition, participants often constructed coherent and unequivocal arguments supporting the opposite of their original position. These results suggest a dramatic potential for flexibility in our moral attitudes, and indicates a clear role for self-attribution and post-hoc rationalization in attitude formation and change.
Tweets*
141
Facebook likes*
14
Reddit*
0
News coverage*
6
Blogs*
8
SC clicks
54
Concepts
Arguments, Addition, Change, Reversal, Argument, Magic, Morality, Social psychology
MeSH headings
-
comments powered by Disqus

* Data courtesy of Altmetric.com